Newcastle means a lot to me having been born, raised and
lived here for the last 18 years of my life. I am passionate in every sense
about releasing the potential our city has for small businesses, local families
and the thousands of tourists who come to explore the wonders we so proudly
boast. From the boutique cafes of Islington to the expansive coastline and everything
us locals know exist in between - there is a lot to be appreciative of. I have
come to this conclusion having recently moved away from my hometown city, and
often compare my experiences elsewhere to that of Newcastle’s. Whether it is
the overcrowded roads of Sydney or the lack of beaches in Darwin, Newcastle
will always come out on top for me and I know I am not alone.
But seeing Newcastle prosper like we all imagine it does,
and dream it can, doesn’t just come through good luck or chance. Over recent decades
the transition from the hard-working blue-collar city we once where, to the
steadfastly cosmopolitan and diverse place we are now has been the hard work of
so many. These people share the grand vision of a city that embraces
businesses, fosters growth and encourages investment, whilst also providing the
social platform we all desire. These people have come from a range of
backgrounds and experiences, which has put us in good stead to suit the needs
of so many going forward. But this hard
work over the last decade has the potential to be halted by the backward views
and political motivations of a certain few. Newcastle’s rejuvenation cannot
risk this.
The NSW State Election on 28 March provides an opportunity
to either continue this positive path of renewal, or forget what has been
achieved to please minority groups stuck in Yesterday’s Newcastle. What these
people seem to have forgotten is that BHP did close in 1999 and that the needs
of 20th century Novocastrians is disparately different to that of
today. It seems James A. Belasco was right in his book ‘Flight of the Buffalo’: Change is hard because people
overestimate the value of what they have—and underestimate the value of what
they may gain by giving that up. Newcastle has and continues to change for the
better, and those who oppose this must recognise that they overestimate the
value of a Newcastle held back in potential as Belasco has poignantly postulated.
The staunch opposition to progress from the likes of Labor’s
candidate Tim Crakanthorp is disappointing given the position he finds himself
in. It is people li
ke Tim who should be the stalwarts of renewing the CBD, not figureheads of a movement that goes against what has already been achieved. What’s most disappointing is the political motivation behind Labor’s backward plans for Newcastle, rather than providing a reasonable alternate route to creating a world-class city.
ke Tim who should be the stalwarts of renewing the CBD, not figureheads of a movement that goes against what has already been achieved. What’s most disappointing is the political motivation behind Labor’s backward plans for Newcastle, rather than providing a reasonable alternate route to creating a world-class city.
Tim Crakanthorp’s opposition to the $340 million injection
from the lease of Newcastle’s Port and $120 million investment from the Hunter
Infrastructure fund, on top of the hundreds of millions GPT plans to spend in
the East End shows his naivety in the face of a great deal for our city. This
blatant aversion to revitalising Newcastle is startling and brings into
question his aspiration for office, given that it is clearly not to see our
city thrive. This makes true that
putting Labor last means putting Newcastle first.
With Karen Howard and the Baird Liberal Government planning
Light Rail through the CBD, promising to support new and existing businesses
and creating a conduit from our city to our harbour by removing the heavy rail
– the choice could not be more evident. It’s
a vote for a candidate that wholeheartedly supports the creation of a
world-class city through various revitalisation projects, or a candidate with a
penchant for empty shopfronts on Hunter St and would cancel the current plans
if given the chance.
As a young Novocastrian, it is at the forefront of my mind
what Newcastle will be like when my peers and I inherit it as the adult
s of tomorrow. Will there be businesses that want to open in our CBD? Will there be an open connection from Hunter St to the Harbour? Will there be Light rail that connects the best aspects of our city? Will there be any reason to come into the city? This rationale has shaped by belief that we should act now, for the sake of the future, and so that we have the infrastructure, transport and economy that will be able to meet the challenges the coming years and decades will most definitely hold.
s of tomorrow. Will there be businesses that want to open in our CBD? Will there be an open connection from Hunter St to the Harbour? Will there be Light rail that connects the best aspects of our city? Will there be any reason to come into the city? This rationale has shaped by belief that we should act now, for the sake of the future, and so that we have the infrastructure, transport and economy that will be able to meet the challenges the coming years and decades will most definitely hold.
On March 28th Novocastrians have a great
opportunity to vote for the Newcastle we all love and enjoy. A Newcastle that
is vibrant, energetic, dynamic and connected. A vote for Karen Howard will
undoubtedly ensure this and I would encourage you all to support her plans to
make a NEWcastle. Let’s see our city move forward, not backwards. Let’s make
Newcastle the city we all know it can and deserves to be. Let's say YES to Karen Howard!
No comments:
Post a Comment